[34783] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Network for Sale
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Mon Feb 19 16:26:36 2001
From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>,
"Alex Bligh" <amb@gxn.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:19:55 -0500
Message-ID: <FHEBKELAPEKHCBCFIEBBEEBOCCAA.dan@netrail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010219120916.A32054@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
InterNAP has done the tier-0 marketing dance for some time. Quite
successfully, as a matter of fact. Secret Sauce sells like hotcakes. Wall
Street likes it as well. Not much of a performance increase, though.
- Daniel Golding
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> Majdi S. Abbas
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Alex Bligh
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Network for Sale
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 07:51:30PM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote:
> > If you refuse to peer with anyone at all, you can be tier-0. This
> > can be achieved with considerable savings to phone line utilization.
>
> Actually, we already have a tier-0. See:
>
> http://www.opnix.net/perl/PressRelease.cgi?article=100032
>
> (And many other things on their website.)
>
> Particularly amusing is:
>
> http://www.opnix.net/whatwedo/performance.shtml
>
> --msa
>
