[34635] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP deployment and peering questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan O'Connell)
Thu Feb 15 05:13:40 2001
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:11:30 +0000
From: Ryan O'Connell <ryan@complicity.co.uk>
To: Blaz Zupan <blaz@amis.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010215111130.A16631@look-to-windward.complicity.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102151047260.15460-100000@titanic.medinet.si>; from blaz@amis.net on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:49:28AM +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:49:28AM +0100, Blaz Zupan wrote:
> > Unless Cisco have changed something, a 3640 can only take 64Mb of memory max.
> > You'd need a 3660 for 128Mb.
>
> You got that backwards. A 3640 can take 128Mb of memory just fine, a 3620 is
> limited to 64Mb.
Yes, you're quite right of course. I should know that, I have 3640s with 96Mb
in. (Must have more Caffiene before NANOGing...) And, of course, it's 256Mb
for a 3660.
--
Ryan O'Connell - <ryan@complicity.co.uk> - http://www.complicity.co.uk
I'm not losing my mind, no I'm not changing my lines,
I'm just learning new things with the passage of time
