[34534] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Question - how do work around pigheaded ISPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Craig A. Huegen)
Sat Feb 10 00:41:37 2001
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 21:39:30 -0800
From: "Craig A. Huegen" <chuegen@pentics.com>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: DRoisman@station.sony.com, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010209213930.C16372@pentics.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010210051840.16152.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>; from sean@donelan.com on Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:18:40PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 09:18:40PM -0800, Sean Donelan wrote:
==>Return the 172.16.0.0/16 block to the registry (ARIN, APNIC, RIPE or if
==>no one else IANA) and apply for multiple appropriately sized CIDR blocks
==>under the current registry allocation guidelines.
While I fully agree with this approach to deal with the issues mentioned,
it will only exhaust the new address space more quickly. Why should we
give up on 128/2?
/cah
