[34372] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jamie rishaw)
Sat Feb 3 23:20:47 2001

Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:36:35 -0500
From: jamie rishaw <jamie@arpa.com>
To: Jeffrey Meltzer <meltzer@villageworld.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010203213635.N389@arpa.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010203164347.E6636@isite.net>; from jrhett@isite.net on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:43:47PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:43:47PM -0800, Joe Rhett wrote:
> My god, are there really this many idiots out there that don't grasp how
> the world works?


core1.chi(config)# router opinion JoeRhett

% NANOG-5-NOSUCH: NanogTalk node 31337.123 misconfigured: unnecessary comment/opinion discarded




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post