[34367] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Sat Feb 3 22:38:01 2001

Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039C48@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Paul A Vixie' <vixie@mfnx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:34:10 -0800 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> From: Paul A Vixie [mailto:vixie@mfnx.net]
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 3:03 PM

> > The category "OS vendors" gets a little fishy... Do Linus 
> Torvalds and
> > Alan Cox get on the list if they sign the NDA?  How about Patrick
> > Volkerding?
> 
> If they're mature trustworthy people (I know Linus but not 
> those other guys)
> and if they need some time to get patches ready for large 
> user bases, then I
> feel sure that they'd be welcomed gladly.

The catagory "OS vendors" may be a canard. MHSC is a Caldera VAR, but we
also have live servers and so do our clients. We had already deployed
BIND-8.2.3 before Caldera even made it available. That channel takes too
long. I'm not a direct Sun customer, but I'll wager that Sun has yet to make
it available to their customers. The same goes for HP and IBM.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post