[34365] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BIND 9 vs djbdns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Rhett)
Sat Feb 3 21:30:08 2001
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:49:34 -0800
From: Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net>
To: "Dave 'Duke of URL' Weiner" <davew@webmast.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010203164934.F6636@isite.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Dave 'Duke of URL' Weiner <davew@webmast.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <016f01c08e2f$246ffce0$0200a8c0@webmast.com>; from davew@webmast.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 05:17:46PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> For those of you who have upgraded from 8.2.3 to 9.x, how difficult was it for you?
> Did you see a marked improvement in performance?
BIND 9 is not yet supposed to be faster unless you are using multiple
processors. BIND 9.1 has made significant improvements in speed, and more
are expected for 9.2.
No problems experienced in any fashion with upgrading.
--
Joe Rhett Chief Technology Officer
JRhett@ISite.Net ISite Services, Inc.
PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
