[34362] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Rhett)
Sat Feb 3 20:47:42 2001
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:40:34 -0800
From: Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net>
To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010203164034.D6636@isite.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
Paul Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102031130210.64677-100000@localhost>; from patrick@cybernothing.org on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 11:38:56AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> CERT has NEVER been the source of early warnings. By the time they release
> information it has already been dissimenated in a variety of other forums.
>
> Can you understand that?
Paul isn't responsible for building an organization to replace CERT. His
support list doesn't make the response center environment any better or any
worse than it currently is.
If you want something better than CERT, build it yourself. This is unrelated.
--
Joe Rhett Chief Technology Officer
JRhett@ISite.Net ISite Services, Inc.
PGP keys and contact information: http://www.noc.isite.net/Staff/
