[34354] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Ambler)
Sat Feb 3 19:09:58 2001
Message-ID: <009401c08e36$521a3000$0a01a8c0@ambler.net>
Reply-To: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-nanog@iodesign.com>
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler-nanog@iodesign.com>
To: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>,
"'Patrick Greenwell'" <patrick@cybernothing.org>,
"Paul A Vixie" <vixie@mfnx.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:09:11 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > Will these 141 organizations many of whose business relies on BIND =
be
> > eligible for your fee-based list? Do they consitute providers=20
> > of "critical
> > infrastructure" in your eyes?=20
>=20
> Considering that they have a positive revenue model (vs TLD registries =
that
> don't, or have negative revenue models) I would suggest that they pay =
for it
> and help support ISC/BIND.
Not all registries have negative revenue models. Just the new ones that =
ICANN
chose.
--
Christopher Ambler
CTO, Image Online Design, Inc.
The .Web Internet Domain Registry
chris@the.web=20
