[34309] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kevin Oberman)
Fri Feb 2 19:44:03 2001
Message-Id: <200102030041.f130ffL26270@ptavv.es.net>
To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>
Cc: Joe Rhett <jrhett@isite.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:42:49 PST."
<Pine.BSF.4.21.0102021521370.46909-100000@localhost>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:41:41 -0800
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:42:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>
> Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
>
> P.S. AboveNet is taking the latest BIND vunerability(ies) seriously enough
> that they are beginning wholescale scans of their address space. Draw your
> own conclusions related to masking version numbers.
As far as I know, Paul Vixie is the CTO for AboveNet's parent
organization. I think it's pretty clear that they understand the issues.
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
