[34307] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: More 6509 problems...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ulf Zimmermann)
Fri Feb 2 19:27:07 2001
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:23:40 -0800
From: Ulf Zimmermann <ulf@Alameda.net>
To: Rodney Dunn <rodunn@cisco.com>
Cc: Danny Snyder <dsnyder@nowdocs.com>,
Kenny Sallee <k_sallee@yahoo.com>, agudgeon@firstnet.co.uk,
nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010202162340.W16465@PacHell.Pachell.net>
Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010201182148.P6929@rtp-cse-489.cisco.com>; from rodunn@cisco.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:48PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:48PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>
> Danny,
>
> The interface status should be independent of
> the swithcing path. I've never seen the line
> state be affected by the switching mechanism
> (although I have seen the opposite).
>
> Can you email me the case# you had so I can take
> a look?
I have, because the line state can be controlled by the keepalive.
If the keepalive don't get through because of the switching path .....
>
> rodney
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:22:21PM -0600, Danny Snyder wrote:
> >
> > Ya got me on that one....Cisco didn't really say why and I didn't think to
> > ask them either....
> >
> > --Danny
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kenny Sallee [mailto:k_sallee@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:28 AM
> > To: agudgeon@firstnet.co.uk; 'Danny Snyder'
> > Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: More 6509 problems...
> >
> >
> > How would CEF cause an interface to be up/down? Just curious....Kenny
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alison Gudgeon" <agudgeon@firstnet.co.uk>
> > To: "'Danny Snyder'" <dsnyder@nowdocs.com>; <nanog@merit.edu>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:36 AM
> > Subject: RE: More 6509 problems...
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Hybrid IOS
> > >
> > > I've got IP CEF DISTRIBUTED set globally. Did you have it enabled or
> > > disabled on the T3 interface?
> > >
> > > Ali
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Danny Snyder [mailto:dsnyder@nowdocs.com]
> > > Sent: 30 January 2001 16:21
> > > To: agudgeon@firstnet.co.uk; nanog@merit.edu
> > > Subject: RE: More 6509 problems...
> > >
> > >
> > > Alison,
> > >
> > > I've had VERY similar problems with a 6509 (Sup 1a + MSFC2) with a FlexWAN
> > > and a PA-2T3+. After spending the better part of two weeks on the phone
> > > with Cisco, we finally determined that ip cef distributed needed to be
> > > turned on in global configuration.
> > >
> > > Also, are you running native IOS or Catalyst OS on the Supervisor and IOS
> > on
> > > the MSFC ?
> > >
> > > Danny Snyder
> > > Network Administrator
> > > NowDocs, Inc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> > > Alison Gudgeon
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 10:18 AM
> > > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > > Subject: More 6509 problems...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is anyone doing the following:
> > >
> > > 6509 (supervisor 1a + msfc) - with a flexWAN adapter to take a Packet Over
> > > Sonet OC-3 card.
> > >
> > > I'm having great problems getting up/up on the interface, the current
> > > situation is up/down, a hardware loop at the telco kit brings the line
> > up/up
> > > but otherwise just up/down. Config is default I've just put IP's on.
> > >
> > > I'm running very new code - 12.1(4)E1
> > >
> > > many thanks in advance for any help.
> > >
> > >
> > > Kind Regards
> > >
> > >
> > > Alison
> > >
> > >
> >
--
Regards, Ulf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936
Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073
