[34291] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J Bacher)
Fri Feb 2 10:34:06 2001

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:29:16 -0600 (CST)
From: J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com>
To: Pim van Riezen <pi@vuurwerk.nl>
Cc: North America Network Operators Group Mailing List <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.30.0102021243130.115762-100000@jones.lab.madscience.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0102020927360.6926-100000@ns.shawneelink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



> Voila, I think that this is what my problem was. Like I said, the
> information _was_ out there, it was just not intuitively available. So the
> upgrade will scare some people off, if they don't manage to find it.

You are in an unenviable position.  But in support of ISC, this problem is
listed in FAQ which is reachable through www.isc.org.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post