[34287] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pim van Riezen)
Fri Feb 2 07:12:24 2001

Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:05:49 +0100
From: Pim van Riezen <pi@vuurwerk.nl>
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A7A3C72.749EBF31@ehsco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.30.0102021305150.115762-100000@jones.lab.madscience.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:

> The real culprit in this story is the script-generator. It should have
> been cranking out standard-compliant zone files from day one.

Absolutely. The guilty party for that script has long left the
organization. This is real world, where people have to deal with other
people's messes :).

Pi



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post