[34287] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG] Re: [NANOG] Re: Reasons why BIND isn't being upgraded
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pim van Riezen)
Fri Feb 2 07:12:24 2001
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:05:49 +0100
From: Pim van Riezen <pi@vuurwerk.nl>
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A7A3C72.749EBF31@ehsco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.30.0102021305150.115762-100000@jones.lab.madscience.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> The real culprit in this story is the script-generator. It should have
> been cranking out standard-compliant zone files from day one.
Absolutely. The guilty party for that script has long left the
organization. This is real world, where people have to deal with other
people's messes :).
Pi