[34151] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BIND-9 vs. BIND-8 config incompatabilities continued....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (poptix@sleepybox.poptix.net)
Mon Jan 29 18:34:47 2001
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:31:46 -0600 (CST)
From: <poptix@sleepybox.poptix.net>
To: North America Network Operators Group Mailing List <nanog@merit.edu>
Cc: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010129214700.053244@proven.weird.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101291730170.2263-100000@sleepybox.poptix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I recommend reading bind-9.1.0/doc/misc/options from the bind9
distribution, it explains what is implemented, isnt
implemented, or is obsolete.
Matthew S. Hallacy
XtraTyme Technologies
> That's just the beginning! :-)
>
> Jan 29 13:37:46 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: option 'memstatistics-file' is not yet implemented
> Jan 29 13:37:46 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: the default for the 'auth-nxdomain' option is now 'no'
> Jan 29 13:37:46 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: option 'host-statistics' is not yet implemented
> Jan 29 13:37:46 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: option 'use-id-pool' is obsolete
> Jan 29 13:37:46 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: option 'check-names' is not implemented
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'os' ignored
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'parser' ignored
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'load' ignored
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'panic' ignored
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'packet' ignored
> Jan 29 13:37:47 proven /usr/pkg/sbin/named[22298]: unknown logging category 'eventlib' ignored
>
> I don't yet know if "host-statistics" is still necessary to be able to
> see the source of an RR in a dump file, or not, but if so then that'll
> be a road-block in keeping me from using 9.1.0 in production.
>
> I'm also very partial to 'check-names'. I've been happy using the
> following in many locations:
>
> check-names master fail;
> check-names slave fail;
> check-names response fail;
>
>
