[34034] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How common is lack of DNS server diversity?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Sat Jan 27 08:19:20 2001
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 08:17:00 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010127081700.D22712@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/unnNtmY43mpUSKx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3A723DB2.A5DB09AD@deckpoint.ch>; from tkernen@deckpoint.ch on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:17:06PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--/unnNtmY43mpUSKx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:17:06PM -0400, Thomas Kernen wrote:
>=20
> And what happens if the 4.0.0.0/8 route is flapped from the
> routing table? No more DNS. So you still want route diversity
Then it probably doesn't matter if you resolve their DNS, because you won't=
be
getting to any of their services anyway.
--/unnNtmY43mpUSKx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6cspMEcl9bQ0RMt0RAgLrAKDTqW7CGzm1Jhv+Mxe5idhe1JYbhACghkO9
cGXWl4QPomAvoZyTWk3btKY=
=zCug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/unnNtmY43mpUSKx--
