[33964] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The unwashed and unaggregated
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy)
Thu Jan 25 15:59:42 2001
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:49:37 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
From: Andy <andy@tigerteam.net>
To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@cybernothing.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101251241040.37542-100000@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0101251448240.3010-100000@vision.tigerteam.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> What about using "sane" route aggregation(or lack thereof) as one of the
> determining factors in requests to receive additional address allocation
> from the IP registries?
>
> Good idea, bad idea?
Like a matrix that lists size of blocks and a generally accepted number of
prefixes within a block that size. You must justify your number of
prefixes if its out of the matrix?
andy
