|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F092286039B6D@condor.mhsc.com> From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com> To: 'Peter Galbavy' <peter.galbavy@knowledge.com>, Ryan O'Connell <ryan@complicity.co.uk> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 08:52:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > From: Peter Galbavy [mailto:peter.galbavy@knowledge.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 6:00 AM > > Yes, we intentionally (for some other reason during testing) > set the MTU on > the p2p link to 554 - oops. Will get it switched back... > Still wondering > though - if a normal dial-up has a lower than 1500 MTU, why > would they work. Because PPP does the blocking/deblocking, at the dial port, before it goes out to eth0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |