[33566] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us)
Tue Jan 16 14:24:52 2001

To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <OF58EC3773.211425FA-ON852569D6.00672DD3@dot.state.oh.us>
From: Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:48:15 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


I saw an article in NetworkComputing/Network World where one Company was 
using Fuel Cell's to provide main building power.....Utility power was 
first level backup, generators where the second....

Spencer
****************************************************
Spencer Wood, Network Administrator
Ohio Department Of Transportation
1320 Arthur E. Adams Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43221 
E-Mail: Spencer.Wood@dot.state.oh.us
Phone: 614.644.5422/Fax: 815.361.0714 
**************************************************** 




"Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu
01/16/2001 01:24 PM

 
        To:     Sean Morrison <seanm@dnai.com>
        cc:     nanog@merit.edu
        Subject:        Re: [Possible OT] California, and running off of generators for extended 
periods



On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 10:03:25AM -0800, Sean Morrison wrote:
>
> Anyone using or considering using a gas turbine instead of diesel to
> run their generators?

Why not just go straight to nuclear powered colo? :P

http://www.uic.com.au/nip60.htm

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>   http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)







home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post