[33550] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNET peering policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Tue Jan 16 03:53:52 2001
Date: 16 Jan 2001 00:51:33 -0800
Message-ID: <20010116085133.20701.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 15 January 2001, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > By saying you should treat the other provider as a black box I mean you
> > should be able to tell if the other provider is meeting or not meeting
> > their performance requirements WITHOUT examination of how much they are
> > paying for their circuits, what type of routers they are using, or how
> > they design their internal network.
>
> I completely agree. (I changed your "with" to a "WITHOUT" above, btw.)
Thanks. Yes, that was my intent. Its amazing what a difference
half-a-word can make.
