[33500] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How does one make not playing nice with each other scale? (Was: net.terrorism)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anne Marcel)
Sat Jan 13 13:24:41 2001
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 19:22:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Anne Marcel <marcel@our.domaintje.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <g3u273nxn0.fsf@redpaul.mfnx.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1010113191630.65871A-100000@our.domaintje.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Ah... In that case they could ask abovenet to leak any nullrouted blocks
that are local to abovenet with a community set so they can find another
path to dump that traffic.
My appologies for assuming that this was was in AS777.
- marcel
#include <disclaimer.std>
On 13 Jan 2001, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> marcel@our.domaintje.com (Anne Marcel) writes:
>
> > There is no need to deaggregate the /16 that contain nullrouted /32's.
> > This information is (in this case) already available from AS7777 as a
> > multihop eBGP feed.
>
> Nope. No part of ORBS is listed in AS7777. The block which inspired this
> thread is completely private to AS6461 and has to do with that network's AUG.
>
>
