[33388] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: net.terrorism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Belcher)
Tue Jan 9 16:40:15 2001
From: "John Belcher" <jbelcher@xram.com>
To: "'Adrian Chadd'" <adrian@creative.net.au>, <jbelcher@xram.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:22:31 -0500
Message-ID: <003401c07a79$e5b59cd0$7b111fac@onepromisehq.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010110023426.B79667@ewok.creative.net.au>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>The question here is whether above.net are within their rights to enforce
>their AUP upon non-customers. vuurwerk aren't a customer. vuurwerk are
>a customer of uunet, not above.net . Now, if above.net are filtering
>someone's network who isn't a directly connected customer, that doesn't
>come across as "simply enforcing their AUP."
I understand what you are saying, but regardless, if he is a UUnet customer
he should take this up with UUnet and let them deal with it. Just because
he isn't a customer does not mean that abovenet should make changes to their
policies.
-John
