[33384] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net.terrorism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jerry Scharf)
Tue Jan 9 16:00:26 2001
Message-Id: <200101091943.f09JhXZ04124@sh.lh.vix.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 11:43:31 -0800
From: Jerry Scharf <scharf@vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I can't resist trying to sum this up:
Somebody wants to talk to an ORBS server and has Abovenet transit. They don't
like being caught in the orbs/abovenet mess.
So rather than
a) getting a new provider
b) getting another provider and fixing the local routing to use them to ORBS
the person opted for
c) send a misleading flame message to NANOG
Operational issues of enforcing trafic delivery policies for customers has
been discussed till it's dead. Everyone knows where they stand, and anyone who
does it has is as part of their service agreement. As has been pointed out,
this is not a subject that will engender any sympathy in this group.
does anything else need to be said? If not, let's let this die.
jerry
