[33355] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: net.terrorism
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jlewis@lewis.org)
Tue Jan 9 09:45:22 2001
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:12:31 -0500 (EST)
From: <jlewis@lewis.org>
To: Sabri Berisha <sabri@bit.nl>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101091430460.15666-100000@pomo.bit.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101090908010.1299-100000@redhat1.mmaero.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> We pay Abovenet to send traffic, not to throw it away.
And if you know they can't/won't send traffic to certain destinations, you
can static route those destinations to another carrier.
> > 1) filter the route from abovenet
>
> They should not be announcing in the first place.
They're not really announcing...they're propogating a route someone else
announced. As Vixie said, it's highly impractical to carve up a /16
(especially if it's not their space) just to avoid propogating a route for
a host they don't want to carry traffic to.
> That's always an option. Hey, they are killing all asian people, let's
> look the other way... Hey, they are killing russians now, let's look the
> other way... Hey, they are killing americans now, let's look the other
> way... Hey, they are killing europea EOF
And you're saying Above should look the other way while ORBS abuses their
network?
I think it's just about procmail time if this thread continues.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route
System Administrator | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________