[33338] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNET peering policyy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Majdi S. Abbas)
Tue Jan 9 05:50:44 2001
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 02:47:08 -0800
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20010109024708.A17216@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10101090945050.14546-100000@rem.opaltelecom.co.uk>; from steve@opaltelecom.co.uk on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:47:47AM +0000
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:47:47AM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Hmm, what are they trying to prove? They want to own the Internet no
> doubt. I'd prefer to pay another like Genuity for transit to UUNET than
> pay them direct and feed their appetite for power.
Because, as we all know, Genuity has a much more generous
peering policy....
--msa
