[33103] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC1918 addresses to permit in for VPN?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Brown)
Fri Dec 29 13:11:03 2000
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:00:15 -0500
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet@graffiti.com>
To: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001229130015.A29802@noc.untraceable.net>
Reply-To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012291255210.22358-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>; from nanog@EnterZone.Net on Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:57:10PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>Oh, you're quite right. So, the moral of this story is:
>
>If you want your network to look right and act right, don't use 1918 space
>on your routers.
it's not my network i'm whining about...it's bt. oh well. whatever.
grr...grumble...mumble...
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
