[33029] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: florida ix(en) facing south
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bennett Todd)
Thu Dec 21 13:18:06 2000
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:10:50 -0500
From: Bennett Todd <bet@rahul.net>
To: Scott Patterson <scottp@netrail.net>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID: <20001221131050.G31736@oven.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <FPENJCCBJKPHKLKBDGILIEKIDDAA.scottp@netrail.net>; from scottp@netrail.net on Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 12:17:26PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
2000-12-21-12:17:26 Scott Patterson:
> 2000-12-21-09:13:08 Randy Bush:
> > folk clueless enough to put up a shockwave-only page sure ain't
> > gonna get a lot of big isp business.
> That's marketing folks for ya. Can't hold that against what the
> NAP can offer.
Actually, you can.
If the website doesn't conform to reasonable standards, then either
the company doesn't have technically competant people, or else they
aren't able to influence the public website. Either way, I'd
certainly steer a wide berth around any such company.
It's within the bounds of possibility that the company really has
technically competant people, who don't for whatever reason care
about the public presence of their company on the net, but could fix
it if they bothered. Even that fantasy scenario doesn't make me want
to do business with them.
-Bennett
--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6QkeqL6KAps40sTYRAg0tAJ9B2srP9XT3jSMVzO0Oqc0/KGbNzACggDYI
KhiXvgHytN5v09lMrCVncQY=
=uGe5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--eHhjakXzOLJAF9wJ--
