[32956] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Port scanning legal
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roeland Meyer)
Tue Dec 19 15:49:10 2000
Message-ID: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F0922869B7B@condor.mhsc.com>
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: 'Dan Hollis' <goemon@sasami.anime.net>,
Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>,
"'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:40:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon@sasami.anime.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 12:26 PM
> > The argument against port-scanning applies equally well to
> just about every
> > diagnostic tool we use.
>
> Only by the most convoluted thinking.
Let's see, we *are* talking court cases and lawyers here ... what was that
you said about convoluted thinking? When was th last time you argued with an
attorney, either in or out of court? When was the last successful time?
