[32946] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shawn McMahon)
Tue Dec 19 13:56:26 2000
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:54:21 -0500
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@eiv.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001219135421.B10893@eiv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012191139490.9490-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>; from nanog@EnterZone.Net on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:44:55AM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:44:55AM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
>=20
> Until you build an exchange point yourself, don't belittle ours.
Now that's a ridiculous standard.
By that logic, one couldn't say "the 1995 Ford Aspire sucks" unless one
has built a car.
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6P67dEcl9bQ0RMt0RAn0eAJ0QCRSkq8VzpRYpoSQo5pNEj6AyDACgxjMs
NqyDYmrxpQiUYlKreuSmTN0=
=4Pes
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--
