[32927] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A. Steenbergen)
Tue Dec 19 00:51:11 2000
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:48:33 -0500 (EST)
From: "Richard A. Steenbergen" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012190044350.816-100000@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 09:14:53PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
> > So, what you're saying is that I should tell all the folks that want to
> > peer via ATM at CMH-IX (which supports 10/100/GE at this time) that they
> > should get bent or get GigE, right?
> >
> > THANK YOU!
>
> I had to go google search for this one, and I presume you mean
> http://www.cmh-ix.net/. If so, it's a good thing the operators made the
> wise decision to support GigE, otherwise they couldn't possibly expect
> to meet demand. :-)
In this case, perhaps an 8-port Linksys hub would be more appropriate for
their needs. :P
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/humble
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
