[32859] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Packet Loss
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Dec 15 10:57:24 2000
Message-Id: <200012151551.eBFFpKCW23482@black-ice.cc.vt.edu>
To: "John R. Grant" <jgrant@liveonthenet.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:24:04 CST."
<Pine.LNX.4.30.0012150921140.15394-100000@grant.liveonthenet.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-322173952P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:51:20 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-322173952P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:24:04 CST, "John R. Grant" said:
> <cringe>
> that would be 9600 bit per inch GCR format 9-track tape, don't you think?
> </cringe>
At least in the IBM world, the options for 7-track were 200/556/800 bpi
with even or odd parity, and mode=normal/data converter/translator. For
9-track the options are 800 NRZI, 1600 PE, and 6250 GCR.
I still have 21 9-track tapes in my office that I need to do something with,
as our last system with 3420-style round tapes is being decomissioned in
the next few months.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Operating Systems Analyst
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-322173952P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/16/2000
iQA/AwUBOjo993At5Vm009ewEQLVGACgzAmaH5S1jUc6xbbCqUheRSfD7eEAoPzi
jXnxnqGEvq9AeDLMexxUyC6g
=EgXr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-322173952P--
