[32825] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Packet Loss
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karyn Ulriksen)
Thu Dec 14 13:37:02 2000
Message-ID: <0127E258EE29D3118A0F00609765B44847CF76@dhcp-gateway.sitestream.net>
From: Karyn Ulriksen <kulriksen@publichost.com>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:56:27 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="windows-1252"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Can we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here? Packet Loss may take on a whole
new meaning here...
K (sorry, couldn't resist)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark E. Perkins [mailto:meperkins@att.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:42 AM
> To: Randy Bush; Charles Smith
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Packet Loss
>
>
>
> Perhaps you mean 2680? (As in RFC)
>
> --On Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:20 PM +0000 Randy Bush
> <randy@psg.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so,
> please send me
> >> the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict
> >> definition.
> >
> > 2628
> >
> >
>
>
>
