[32737] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interliant and Digex
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kai Schlichting)
Fri Dec 8 13:58:51 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001208134922.00c6ae10@127.0.0.1>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 13:57:14 -0500
To: LBolton@geiger.com, nanog@merit.edu
From: Kai Schlichting <kai@pac-rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <OF7A77C0BA.C3FAA8DF-ON852569AF.00662556@geiger.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At Friday 01:39 PM 12/8/00, LBolton@geiger.com wrote:
>My company is considering using either Interliant or Digex for Web Hosting.
>Any opinions of either company would be appreciated.
>
>Please feel free to respond privately.
>
>Many thanks in advance.
>
>Lars Bolton
>lbolton@geiger.com
If you like to do business with spammers - go ahead.
I am getting REALLY sick and tired of Interliant stealing contact information
from the NSI whois database and printing them on postcards for postal spam
(and I sure as hell didn't give NSI any permission whatsoever in selling
my contact info ; I know, they've been selling it lately; whether I want
their spam or not is ultimately InterLIARs concern though). As far as as
ethics standards for Digex/Intermedia is concerned, my mind is clouded
right now, but Interliant will never find consideration at places where
I am at the helm. That same behavior has cost Savvis some substantial
contract(s) this year, from DSL lines over T1's to a DS-3, new ones and
extensions alike. Names not omitted to blame the guilty.
--
"Just say No" to Spam Kai Schlichting
New York, Palo Alto, You name it Sophisticated Technical Peon
Kai's SpamShield <tm> is FREE! http://www.SpamShield.org
| |
LeasedLines-FrameRelay-IPLs-ISDN-PPP-Cisco-Consulting-VoiceFax-Data-Muxes
WorldWideWebAnything-Intranets-NetAdmin-UnixAdmin-Security-ReallyHardMath
