[32730] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: California power - its cold, its dark

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Stratton)
Fri Dec 8 00:09:43 2000

Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 00:07:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan@robotics.net>
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9DC8BBAD4FF100408FC7D18D1F0922869AA4@condor.mhsc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0012080004150.54434-100000@Andy.robotics.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Roeland Meyer wrote:

> Thanks for the links guys. Now, here's the summary.
>
> 1) California power load is still 10,000 MW below peak delivery of last
> Summer.

What happens next summer when there will be more demand? I don't see any
new generation coming online anytime soon. I guess it is time to look at
new turbine technology.

> 2) Slightly over 1/3 of the generation plants are down for "maintenance".

Sure :-) Lets make some money on the spot market time.

One odd thing I did notice is that my voltage graphs in CA are very close
to the load graphs on the caiso website.

><>
Nathan Stratton				CTO, Exario Networks, Inc.
nathan@robotics.net                     nathan@exario.net
http://www.robotics.net                 http://www.exario.net



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post