[32423] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: ISPs as content-police or method-police

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Slagle)
Tue Nov 21 15:13:06 2000

Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:33:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Jason Slagle <raistlin@tacorp.net>
To: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Cc: "'Shawn McMahon'" <smcmahon@eiv.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <47FE39302BF73B4C93BC84B87341282C1F25@condor.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0011211433070.11444-100000@mail.tacorp.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> 4) Offer port filtering as an added premium service that adds to your
> revenue stream. That way it is customer choice. However, this only applies
> to access providers. Backbone providers don't have this option.

And if they don't take it and are being used as a DDOS amp?

You are they back to option 3, which is if they are being used to attack
others you turn them off till they fix it...

Jason



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post