[32411] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: good grief (RE: IPv4HT - Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Tue Nov 21 13:41:15 2000
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Cc: <ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 13:36:17 -0500
Message-ID: <NEBBJKIJGLMGELMBGHEOKECNCDAA.ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <0b8c01c053e8$fbc0ab80$df00a8c0@ValuedSonyCustomer>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Read the sig, Jim.
For all other product related questions, call 1-800-4-DOTNET.
--
Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm
Sr. Architect, Engineering & Architecture, BellSouth.net, Atlanta, GA, U.S.
"I speak for myself only."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JIM FLEMING [mailto:jfleming@anet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 1:29 PM
> To: Christian Kuhtz; nanog@nanog.org
> Cc: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Subject: Re: good grief (RE: IPv4HT - Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label)
>
>
> Thanks....
>
> Just so we are clear, are you saying that it is a global Bell South policy
> NOT to provide (clear-channel) (end-to-end) IPv4 TOS field transport ?
> ...IPv4HT
>
> OR....are you saying that Bell South does provide IPv4HT, but a special
> service
> order is required ?...and additional costs ?
>
> Lastly, if we look at the tiny, 32-bit, legacy IPv4 address space, can we
> identify
> blocks (ranges) of addresses which Bell South uses to provide IPv4HT ?
>
> ...if people routing IPv4HT traffic to Bell South, only route based on those
> blocks, will
> that be OK ?...
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
> http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
> http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
>
[.. noise removed ..]
