[3229] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: critique of NANOG meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Young)
Thu Jun 20 10:40:21 1996
To: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
cc: avg@postman.ncube.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jun 1996 23:33:34 EDT."
<199606200333.XAA20838@newdev.harvard.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 10:34:05 -0400
From: "Jeff Young" <young@mci.net>
but the columns i've read from him are mostly comprised of
fear mongering. it's not as if he's trying to explain the
mission of groups like nanog or the ietf, he's pointing to
things that he believes are wrong with these groups and
concluding that "the internet will fail because..." i think
he's a bright guy who's very influential with the user
community. i think he could explain many things about the
internet to john q. public. i think that if he wanted to
he could poke constructive criticism at all of us. i just
don't think that he wants to explain much of anything.
why would a bright, accomplished person who could be of so
much help to this community write such articles? he has
a personal agenda?
Jeff Young
young@mci.net
> Return-Path: sob@newdev.harvard.edu
> Received: from newdev.harvard.edu (newdev.harvard.edu [128.103.65.15]) by postoffice.Reston.mci.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA15580 for <young@mci.net>; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 23:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.7.3/8.6.10-MT4.00) id XAA20838; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 23:33:34 -0400 (EDT)
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 23:33:34 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
> Message-Id: <199606200333.XAA20838@newdev.harvard.edu>
> To: avg@postman.ncube.com, nanog@merit.edu, young@mci.net
> Subject: Re: critique of NANOG meeting
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 412
>
> > Actually i don't understand what his motivation is.
>
> I think the answer to that is simple - he wants the net to be seen
> as working to the users and fears that is not now the case (in some
> places) and that the "not the case" will spread before it gets better.
>
> his is a case where I think he is doing what he thinks is the right thing
> (not always the case with some of the commenters about the net :-) )
>
> Scott
