[32226] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Operational impact of filtering SMB/NETBIOS traffic?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Shaw)
Tue Nov 14 20:03:41 2000
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 18:57:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
To: "Sutantyo, Danny" <danny.sutantyo@intel.com>
Cc: Scott Call <scall@devolution.com>, <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0011141747260.29029-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0011141854040.29029-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
After a few people e-mailed me for specifics, I was unable to find them
on either technet or via the search engines. The topic came up this
summer at USENIX at a talk given by Marcus Ranum on IDS, when we took a
detour through firewalling, IDS, and applications that can encapsualte
traffic. I know Napster was addressed as well as Netbios. However,
unable to find any definitive information, I respectuflly withdraw my
comment.
--
Joseph W. Shaw
Sr. Network Security Specialist for Big Company not to be named because I
don't speak for them here. I have public opinions, and they don't.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Joe Shaw wrote:
> Sorry, it was a poor choice of words. I should have said netbios can now
> be transported over 80/TCP in Win2k. I was discussing proxies with
> someone else and it snuck into my e-mail thought process.
>
> --
> Joseph W. Shaw
> Sr. Network Security Specialist for Big Company not to be named because I
> don't speak for them here. I have public opinions, and they don't.
