[32147] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: MCI WORLDCOM TO PAY $3.5 MILLION

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Sun Nov 12 21:04:10 2000

Date: 12 Nov 2000 18:01:00 -0800
Message-ID: <20001113020100.26986.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: mark-list@mentovai.com
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Sun, 12 November 2000, "Mark Mentovai" wrote:
> The drive to "slam" is pushed by dollars.  I can't think of any situation in
> which someone might profit from announcing address space without
> authorization.  The problems facing the Internet are mostly due to laziness
> and lack of clue, enabled by an experimental infrastructure designed to
> support neither of these things.  IP assumes non-hostile, non-lazy, and
> non-clueless nodes.

Sure it is.  When I asked why did providers announced addresses improperly,
I've been told by both Sprint and UUNET engineers "because they paid us and
you don't."





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post