[32014] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DoS attacks, NSPs unresponsiveness

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Fri Nov 3 04:51:38 2000

Date: 3 Nov 2000 01:49:32 -0800
Message-ID: <20001103094932.1966.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: hank@att.net.il
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Thu, 02 November 2000, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> We can write as many RFCs and BCPs as we want and discuss this item again 
> and again - the truth is - nothing we say or do will make a difference 
> until the government creates regulation on the matter.  The same way every 
> phone company has to run a 911 number in event of emergencies, so too must 
> ISPs provide an abuse@xxxxx.net email address that not only gives an 
> auto-reply but actually has people behind it to handle the problem.

People from at least three different US Government agencies have asked
me if there is a need for government intervention in this precise area,
either full-blown laws and regulations; or nudging such as including it
in GSA and other government contracts (i.e. like the drug-free workplace
requirements if you want to bid on a government contract).

I'm old enough to remember the AUP NSF days (and I walked to school in
the snow, up hill both ways).  I'm afraid if we go down this path, the
intervention won't be limited.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post