[31992] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RADWare Linkproof? (or better ways to multihome)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barton F. Bruce)
Thu Nov 2 19:48:37 2000
Message-ID: <004301c04493$1487f6b0$74d1bece@cent.net>
Reply-To: "Barton F. Bruce" <barton@gnaps.com>
From: "Barton F. Bruce" <barton@cent.net>
To: "John Fraizer" <nanog@EnterZone.Net>,
"Barton F. Bruce" <barton@gnaps.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 01:06:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Um, you've got a 26xx series Cisco taking multiple full views? (The
> subject does say "or better ways to multihome".)
>
I certainly don't, but have techie home users, must-stay-up.com, and
smaller ISPcustomers that used to be able to take full routes in 26xx
routers but now filter to keep a modest set of routes to optimize some
of the outgoing and then have default routes to handle the rest.
Has anyone actually TRIED 128 meg in a 2621? Remember there have been
undocumented capabilities in the past. A newer 4500 thatis actually
built from a 4700 motherboard does take 64 meg (the earlier ones
didn't).
Cisco now says don't cross memory between 262x and 265x. Is this a true
no-no, or simply cisco not wanting you to make a nice discovery.
