|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:03:51 -0600 (CST) From: J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> To: jtk@aharp.is-net.depaul.edu Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <3A019B40.D5D50B50@depaul.edu> Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0011021101180.30365-100000@ns.shawneelink.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > > Some suggestions: > > A response I get is that they won't do it because it has a negative > performance impact on their routers. They blame the router vendors. > Suggestion 5), someone calculate what performance penalty there is for > typical router configurations when these filters are applied. Show some > performance numbers that make the case for or against filtering. I've seen the same concerns. Point is, if an individual is concerned enough to identify what is perceived as a serious problem, then the indivdiual also needs to identify potential solutions. If those solutions require sufficient data for justification -- fine. If not, then what is the point of complaining?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |