[31832] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DOS Attacks and reliable network contact data.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Shaw)
Sun Oct 22 20:18:30 2000
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 19:13:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw@insync.net>
To: Jason Slagle <raistlin@tacorp.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0010221603051.4868-100000@mail.tacorp.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010221507490.29485-100000@vellocet.insync.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Ah, now I see the issue. That's insanely sparse on the
information. Since I'm really quite ignorant in the area, who gives JPNIC
the power to assign netblocks? APNIC I presume, after checking with
APNIC's whois database. I guess there's no policy for standards and the
like. How do things like standards get enforced amongst registry entities
outside the US?
--
Joseph W. Shaw - jshaw@insync.net
Sr. Security Specialist for <Big company not to be named>.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jason Slagle wrote:
> Yes, but even geektools falls flat on it's face for lets say
> 210.251.128.255.
>
> :sigh: I really wish we could get a common format for these.
>
> I really like the ripe style databases.
