[31792] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: decreased caching efficiency?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Fri Oct 20 14:35:40 2000
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:33:38 -0400
From: Christian Kuhtz <ck@arch.bellsouth.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001020143338.B11682@ns1.arch.bellsouth.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <39F07953.1927A26A@greendragon.com>; from William Allen Simpson on Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:57:25PM -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hey gang,
This discussion is so unbelievably out of control.. ;) At least we're still
true to the good old NANOG tradition of scope creep.
Why are we discussing manipulating content instead of just transport caching?
Can we please stop this non-sense? Including the myriads of pseudo copyright
lawyers on this list, and the large number of falsehoods they portray as
facts... GO AWAY.
A properly working cache should not ever deliver the page differently to the
recipient than the originator intended.
If it does, it's by definition not a cache. Cache's do not alter, they just..
well,.. cache. Everything else is not caching.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Christian Kuhtz Architecture, BellSouth.net
<ck@arch.bellsouth.net> -wk, <ck@gnu.org> -hm Atlanta, GA
"Speaking for myself only."
