|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 00:36:36 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> To: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Message-ID: <20001020003636.J86684@ewok.creative.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010191138540.23418-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>; from nanog@EnterZone.Net on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:43:52AM -0400 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Thu, Oct 19, 2000, John Fraizer wrote: > On this end of the pond, many of us measure success with MRTG and can very > accurately plot profits using the same OIDs. You are absolutely > right. When you're in the business of selling bandwidth, that is what you > are interested in. Not being on the other end of a sat link helps I > suppose. John, I agree, but I would have thought that web providers would have oved the idea of making more money off less equipment. :-) This is why I believe CDN type technology is proving to be more popular than the original forward-caches. I fear though that more and more content will end up defeating even local caches on small links, and THIS is a big problem in my eyes. Solve that, and the problem in the original email is solved .. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "It was then that I knew that I wouldn't <adrian@creative.net.au> die, as a doctor wouldn't fart in front of a dying boy." -- Angela's Ashes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |