[31755] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the new 6509 OSR
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Thu Oct 19 10:42:15 2000
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@COLT.NET>
Message-Id: <200010191434.PAA15366@NetBSD.noc.COLT.NET>
In-Reply-To: <CF113269FDACD311AA8C009027DE9D04060C80AF@conmsx01.conway.acxiom.com> from baburn - Bart Burns at "Oct 19, 2000 09:33:56 am"
To: baburn@acxiom.com (baburn - Bart Burns)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 15:34:51 +0100 (BST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I thought that the ESR was the new 75xx class box?
Regards,
Neil.
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> We are about to purchase several of these OSR's. Here is what we know about
> the OSR. If you look at the roadmap for the OSR, Cisco is positioning this
> platform to be the next 75xx class device only it will be for high-speed
> connectivity at DS-3 or greater. It will scale all the way to OC-192 or 10
> Gig Ethernet. The main reason we are looking at the OSR vs a plain jane
> 6509 is because the OSR can serve as a high-speed ingress point to the MPLS
> backbone that we are about to deploy. The OSR interfaces have deeper
> interface buffers than the plain 6509.
>
> Bart Burns
> Network Engineer
> Acxiom Corporation
> (501) 342-4167
> email bart.burns@acxiom.com
> <<Bart Burns (E-mail).vcf>>
[Attachment, skipping...]
