[3174] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Carpenter CERN-CN)
Tue Jun 18 03:03:21 1996
To: davidc@apnic.net (David R. Conrad)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 08:58:29 +0200 (MET DST)
From: "Brian Carpenter CERN-CN" <brian@dxcoms.cern.ch>
Cc: roll@stupi.se, iepg@iepg.org, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199606180159.KAA12046@teckla.apnic.net> from "David R. Conrad" at Jun 18, 96 11:03:53 am
Randy,
>
> >My view is still that charging for routing announcements is
> >necessary and sufficient -
>
> Sufficient for what?
Sufficient to give folks an incentive to use addresses that aggregate
for routing purposes. (This is carefully phrased *not* to be CIDR-specific.)
>
> >but as I've said before, I think that registries should charge for their
> >*services*, and allocating an address block is a service.
>
> What is the difference in the service charge for allocating
> a /8 compared to allocating a /24?
>
Indeed - I was debating whether to mention that in my previous mail.
I don't have a quick answer.
Brian
