[31711] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: New Peering Point Mailing Lists
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adrian Chadd)
Wed Oct 11 12:15:01 2000
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 00:12:46 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20001012001244.F99611@ewok.creative.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20511.971280233@sunf25>; from simonl@rd.bbc.co.uk on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 05:03:53PM +0100
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> >BTW, it would be *real* good if the NAP's and ISP's can provide more
> >traffic statistics. It may help the customers to decide where and whom
> >to join, and help people who want to have a better understanding about
> >the network. I recall we used to have more traffic data a few years ago,
> >now, there is almost none in US. Currently, from what I have seen
> >recently, NORDUnet (http://www.nordu.net/) is the best ISP by far that
> >provides detailed traffic information....
>
> I think you'll find that there's a few that are open (e.g. Abovenet
> http://www.above.net/traffic/ and ourselves [although we're not US based]
> http://support.bbc.co.uk/support/mrtg/internet/). A lot of the big
> corporates consider it confidential information (it gives away how
> good/bad they are or something).
.. if it was good, there'd be press releases every week with it.
*snigger* ok, so I found that funny. :-)
--
Adrian Chadd "If a butterfly flaps its wings in China,
<adrian@creative.net.au> will a woman get naked in Amsterdam?"
-- Ashley Penney on Chaos Theory
