[31546] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OSPF VS. IS-IS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Nelson)
Wed Sep 27 18:33:41 2000
Message-ID: <2A2BBEF175D5AC4F9796F03C98F08C1F7817A8@ax000002.phx.axient.com>
From: Leo Nelson <lnelson@axient.com>
To: "'Ping Pan'" <pingpan@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:28:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C028D2.4C7073FC"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C028D2.4C7073FC
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Way cool thank you very much Ping
-----Original Message-----
From: Ping Pan [mailto:pingpan@research.bell-labs.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 3:21 PM
To: Leo Nelson
Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: Re: OSPF VS. IS-IS
Some have brought up this question before. Please take a look at
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0006/katz.html
- Ping
> Leo Nelson wrote:
>
> Hello I am in search of any articles that reflect the differences
> between OSPF and IS-IS. I am particularly interested in papers that
> highlight design, implementation, bandwidth usage, and scalability
> concerns for large internetworks.
>
> Also if anyone could give some statistics on the how much IS-IS is
> being used in large scale ISP, ASP, and NAPs
>
> Thank You
> Leo Nelson CCNA
> Axient Communications
> 602.850.3083
------_=_NextPart_001_01C028D2.4C7073FC
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: OSPF VS. IS-IS</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Way cool thank you very much Ping</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Ping Pan [<A HREF="mailto:pingpan@research.bell-labs.com">mailto:pingpan@research.bell-labs.com</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 3:21 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: Leo Nelson</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: OSPF VS. IS-IS</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Some have brought up this question before. Please take a look at</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2><A HREF="http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0006/katz.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0006/katz.html</A></FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>- Ping</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Leo Nelson wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Hello I am in search of any articles that reflect the differences</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> between OSPF and IS-IS. I am particularly interested in papers that</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> highlight design, implementation, bandwidth usage, and scalability</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> concerns for large internetworks.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Also if anyone could give some statistics on the how much IS-IS is</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> being used in large scale ISP, ASP, and NAPs</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Thank You</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Leo Nelson CCNA</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Axient Communications</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> 602.850.3083</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C028D2.4C7073FC--
