[31503] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: netscan.org update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Fraizer)
Tue Sep 26 12:44:41 2000
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:42:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: John Fraizer <nanog@EnterZone.Net>
To: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@MHSC.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1148622BC878D411971F0060082B042C3717@hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009261238310.13218-100000@Overkill.EnterZone.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> Defense is a lot less socially antagonistic than offensively BGP
> black-holing antire IP-blocks (which can get you seriously sued) and
> creating more outages than we already have to suffer through.
Roeland,
The last time I checked, AS65535 (picked for obvious reasons) does not
have a transit contract in place with my company and as such, has
absolutely NO grounds to sue me if we choose to blackhole routes to them
at our borders.
No transit contract -- no guaranteed transit. It's just that simple.
---
John Fraizer
EnterZone, Inc
