[31487] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: netscan.org update
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Shields)
Mon Sep 25 13:40:40 2000
To: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Michael Shields <shields@msrl.com>
Date: 25 Sep 2000 17:38:47 +0000
In-Reply-To: Leo Bicknell's message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:53:34 -0400"
Message-ID: <87og1cxtg8.fsf@challah.msrl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
In article <20000924175334.A46043@ussenterprise.ufp.org>,
Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
> A large part of it is probably that very few administrators
> set of warning bells on a single ping, but a substantial fraction of
> mail administrators get floods of e-mail warnings from the mail testing
> programs, wasting their time and energy.
>
> When you scan properly locked down boxes in a way that fills
> an admins mailbox they get testy.
http://www.nfr.net/forum/publications/id-myths.html
--
Shields.
