[31425] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nicholas harteau)
Sat Sep 23 00:04:43 2000
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:02:27 -0500
From: nicholas harteau <nrh@ikami.com>
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Message-ID: <20000922230227.C971@voyager.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20000923034904.26442.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>; from sean@donelan.com on Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 08:49:04PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Conversely, I'm having a problem where I had some /24s associated with
some T1s from C&W via various ISPs that my company acquired, and when
those T1s were rolled into a DS3, C&W insisted on taking the /24s back
and is currently threatening to stop routing them.
Can't win.
Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 September 2000, John Fraizer wrote:
> > Who's forcing address space on customers? It's like pulling teeth to get
> > address space from most of them!
>
> Cable&Wireless for one. I worked with several customers who never used
> the /24's allocated by C&W, but even after repeatedly telling C&W we don't
> need them, C&W wouldn't take them back. Every circuit came with a /24
> whether you needed it or not.
>
>
--
nicholas harteau
nrh@ikami.com
